Archived Resources

The Resource Library houses tools and products that were developed by IDC, developed with its collaborators, or submitted by IDC stakeholders. Search and filtering tools are available to help users navigate through the library.

Archived Resources 22 - 28 of 31

View Current Resources
Archived Indicators
Archived Topics
Archived Format

    Format: Recordings

    Part C State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report 2017 Indicator Analyses

    The Part C State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report 2017 Indicator Analyses presents a national picture of the implementation of Part C of IDEA based on a review of information 56 states and jurisdictions (55 for Indicator 11) reported in their FFY 2015 APRs and amended state-submitted 2017 SPPs/APRs. For the purposes of the report, the term “state” is used for both states and jurisdictions. The report, which covers Part C Indicators 1 through 11, can be downloaded in Word format.

    Format: Recordings

    Part B State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report 2017 Indicator Analyses
    The Part B State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report 2017 Indicator Analyses presents a national quantitative picture of the implementation of Part B of IDEA based on a review of information 60 states and jurisdictions (with exceptions as noted for individual indicators) reported in their FFY 2015 APRs and amended state-submitted 2017 SPPs/APRs. For the purposes of the report, the term “state” is inclusive of the 50 states and jurisdictions. The report, which covers Part B Indicators 1 through 17, can be downloaded in Word format.

     

    Format: Presentations

    Making APR Local Determinations Meaningful

    In this session, Tennessee shared recent improvements the state made to its process for making annual local determinations as required under IDEA. The Tennessee process demonstrates how the state uses IDEA Section 618 and other data to measure an LEA’s performance toward meeting state targets of the SPP/APR for various indicators and how use of these results is ultimately part of the determination decisionmaking process. Tennessee included the results of these annual determinations in its annual submission of the MOE Reduction and CEIS data.

    Format: Presentations

    Building a Culture of High-Quality Part B Data – Florida and New Jersey

    This session highlighted Florida and New Jersey as presenters. They told their states' stories of how they have created a culture of high-quality data.

    An IDC Resource

    Format: Presentations

    Using State Data to Inform Parent Center Work

    The purpose of this presentation was to introduce PTI and CPRC directors and staff to the IDEA data collected and reported by state education agencies and discuss how these data can be used to inform many of the fourteen priority topics for the PTI/CPRC network. These priorities were  identified in the most recent OSEP requests for proposals for PTI and CPRC funding.

    An IDC Resource

    Format: Toolkits and Templates

    Part C Indicator Data Display Wizard

    This Version 2.0 of the Data Display Wizard creates data displays based on user entry of SPP/APR data. The tool gives users various options for displaying that data. LA staff can use this tool to engage with various stakeholders on how to best display reported SPP/APR data based on the audience, message, and purpose of the desired report or presentation.

    Format: Guides, Papers, and Reports

    Part B State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report 2018 Indicator Analyses

    The Part B State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report 2018 Indicator Analyses presents a national quantitative picture of the implementation of Part B of IDEA based on a review of information 60 states and jurisdictions reported in the FFY 2016 APRs and amended SPPs they submitted to OSEP in spring 2018. For the purposes of the report, the term “state” is used for both states and territories. The report covers Part B Indicators 1 through 17.