Archived Resources

The Resource Library houses tools and products that were developed by IDC, developed with its collaborators, or submitted by IDC stakeholders. Search and filtering tools are available to help users navigate through the library.

Archived Resources 57 - 63 of 123

View Current Resources
Archived Indicators
Archived Topics
Archived Format

    Format: Checklists, Crosswalks, and Rubrics

    FERPA Exceptions Summary

    A privacy and data protection program for student education records must include a set of checks and balances to ensure that the necessary rules and procedures are in place and that they are being fully implemented. This document provides information about how to complete formal periodic audits of the various processes involved in the processing and usage of personally identifiable student information.

    An IDC Resource

    Format: Presentations

    A Review of State Approaches to IDEA Reporting of Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS)

    IDEA allows, and sometimes requires, LEAs to use funds provided under IDEA Part B for CEIS students not identified for and receiving special education and related services. There are multiple data collection and reporting requirements associated with use of these funds for CEIS. IDC staff reviewed and led a discussion on how a diverse subset of states and their LEAs are working to meet those requirements.

    An IDC Resource

    Format: Presentations

    Preliminary Trends on State Policy and Practices on Students With Disabilities Enrolled in Online Courses: Challenges and Implications for Reporting

    Participants engaged in focused discussions with members of IDC's Workgroup on Educational Environments - Online Learning. Workgroup members presented a snapshot of policies on online learning. They also presented a preliminary analysis on data collection and reporting practices in relation to IDEA educational environments from states reporting students with disabilities enrolled in online learning courses. Participants engaged in an interactive discussion on similarities, differences, and needs of practices within their own states.

    An IDC Resource

    Format: Presentations

    Performance Indicators As a Tool for Measuring Progress Toward a SiMR

    This presentation provides guidance on the evaluation of SSIP by differentiating between evaluating implementation and impact and reviews possible measures of progress toward achieving the SIMR. Participants discussed and provided input into development of an IDC white paper on the topic. Currently, the white paper is in draft form and undergoing revisions based on input from the field. The published paper will be posted to the IDC Resource Library and affiliated as a related resource to the handout already posted for this session.

    An IDC Resource

    Format: Applications and Spreadsheets

    Spreadsheet Application for Calculating Disproportionality Measures and User’s Guide

    States can use the Excel spreadsheet application for calculating disproportionality measures and accompanying user's guide in their assessment of racial/ethnic disproportionality. The spreadsheet application calculates several disproportionality measures and the User’s Guide provides instructions for using the spreadsheet application.

    Please note this resource is currently not 508 accessible. If you need assistance with the use of this resource, please contact us at www.ideadata.org.

    An IDC Resource

    Format: Presentations

    Developing a Logic Model for Your SSIP Evaluation

    This presentation focuses on the role that developing a logic model has in overall SSIP evaluation planning.

    Format: Presentations

    Part B Transition Indicators: Supporting States in the SSIP

    The National Post-School Outcomes Center, in collaboration with IDC, provided a picture of post-school outcomes for youth with disabilities over the last four years based on Indicator 14 data. Presenters discussed methods states use to collect these data. To further states' work in RDA and improve results, presenters provided information about resources and TA that support states in examining the transition indicators as stakeholders work through the three phases of the SSIP.